Thursday, July 9, 2009

One Is From 2008 The Other's From 1996

For real though. Karen Hanrahan is a wellness educator who also holds a position as the Director of Advocacy for Middle East and North Africa. When teaching about health, Karen highlights the similarities in presence between the burger from '08 and '96 to support the belief that McDonald's produces chemical food.

In her own words: The burger on the right, off the paper is a 2008 burger. I had to buy it to get the groovy paper and bag. The meat is a tad darker, the bun a little less golden but in 12 years it will look exactly like that too. Do you find this horrifying? McDonalds fills an empty space in your belly. It does nothing to nourish the cell, it is not a nutritious food. It is not a treat. I marvel at how McDonalds has infiltrated our entire world. A hamburger here tastes exactly the same in China or some around the world place. It's cloned. Makes you wonder doesn't it?

Share/Save/Bookmark

10 comments:

  1. Maccas food is like tetris blocks that dont fit into your molacules just like all the other shit processed food, it does not absorb into you as it should and the body just freaks out and stashes it somewhere to just sit and turn into fatty deposits or cancer. Unfortunatly modern living makes it difficult to change peoples ways because its inconveniant truth. Fresh fruit and veges despite taking a little more effort to find and consume will really pay off

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hahaha that's some gnarly shit.

    ReplyDelete
  3. why would you save a burger for twelve years ? your special

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ugh, ultra-gnar! People ask why hamburgers are named so if they are not made out of ham... apparently, according to this data, it got its name because they use hamster meat; known for its longevity?! Uh, don't pass the BBQ sauce says I.

    ReplyDelete
  5. watch food, inc.

    It's showing at the elmwood theaters (assuming you in the bay)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Somebody has an axe to grind.......
    Sensational claims demand sensational proof!

    So why don't you provide some double blinded peer reviewed studies to back up you poor excuse for an argument....

    McDonald's food is far from being good for a person but your claims are sensationalist and ignorant and do nothing but demonstrate your ignorance and bias!

    ReplyDelete
  7. wow, this is great advertisement for McDonalds. Their food has amazing shelf life. And anyone who is against eating chemicals should probably stop eating. if anyone could name one single food they eat that's not a chemical, they're wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm thinking that after 12 years, the color should have become a little lighter.

    ReplyDelete